--- Craig Parmerlee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dean M. Estabrook wrote: > > > Ok ... so I'd like to hear someone else confirm > that the GPO sounds > > are no better at all than standard soundfonts. > True? No? What's the > > concensus? > > I won't say they're no better, but I surely don't > understand the fuss > unless you are using Finale strictly as a sequencer. > In that case, > maybe that last 1% of realism is worth it, but I > cannot understand why > anybody using Finale to compose or arrange music > would want to spend > even an extra 10 minutes fussing with GPO -- let > alone the hours that it > will actually take. > > I've never really considered Finale a serious > sequencer program. Maybe > if I change my outlook on that, I would also think > differently about > GPO. But fundamentally I have a dim view of > technology that is so > distracting that you can barely remember the art you > were trying to create. > Hi Craig, Darcy mentioned it, but I just want to make sure you caught it. For new compositions that you create with the setup wizard, you don't have to do any GPO setup. It's automatically done (and that's a major part of the integration). For older files, yes, you will have to spend some time converting them over. Tyler __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
