On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, David W. Fenton wrote: > The downside is that you have to maintain two sets of > expressions/articulations (printing, non-printing), but that's a > helluva lot easier than maintaining two separate files!
This is what I thought I'd have to do and was hoping to avoid. Where do I send a feature request? I would like to see measure attached expressions with playback that can optionally apply to all midi channels. Or how about the human playback engine applying a measure attached expression to apply to all midi channels. Seems like a reasonable and logical thing to have. There's a similar discussion I saw on the Finale forum about piano staves with separate channels for each hand so the guy can pan left/right and how the human playback automatic pedaling is only being applied to staff 2. This is a case where it should apply to both staves (which are separate channels). The general consensus there, as it seems to be here is that we are stuck adding non-printing expressions to the other staves. James Gilbert http://www.jamesgilbertmusic.com/ _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
