In case anyone is interested I have now been forced to prove my case to
the client, so I looked at the following list of publications:
Mendelssohn, Hebriden-Ouvertüre, Bärenreiter, 2004.
Mozart, Marriage of Figaro, Peters 1941
Beethoven, Sinfonie Nr 6, Eulenburg 1986
Bach, Wohltemperiertes Klavier, Bd. I, Henle, 1950
Bach, Weihnachts-Oratorium, Bärenreiter 1960/1988
Bach, Matthäus-Passion, Bärenreiter, 1972
Haydn, Klaviertrios Band IV, Henle Verlag 1987
The bias on Bärenreiter had to do with the client.
All of these publications follow the rule without exceptions. This was
100% of all publications I looked at.
So I guess that at least the major European publishers (I haven't looked
at Breitkopf, didn't have any at hand) do indeed follow this convention.
I still couldn't convince the client (he doesn't understand that this is
an exception only applicable at system breaks), so since he decides we
will not follow the convention, even though I am unhappy about this. But
who cares?
If anyone has the time I would really be interested if a (any) Peters
publication of Bach Organ works follows this, sometimes or all the
times, or not at all, since he seems to claim that they don't. I cannot
check this since I don't own one. Please also let me know the year of
the publication.
Johannes
On 07.09.2005 22:54 Uhr Johannes Gebauer wrote:
I can't find this in Ted Ross, and am looking for a rule: When a tie
reaches across a System break, should an accidental be repeated on
the second note? I know it can be, but can someone look this up in
the other standard treatises for me, or point me to the right page in
Ted Ross?
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
