Kim Patrick Clow wrote:

I'm wondering if anyone has thoughts on the impact Finale has made on publishing music.

Has it and the creation of desktop publishing had any impact on the business models?

Depends on which business models you are thinking about -- rentals aren't in the least bit affected because the large houses which control the rentals for most (all?) the major composers of the 20th century still maintain their "we don't really have to care because we have a [EMAIL PROTECTED] monopoly, so if you want this great music, you just have to deal with whatever crap we put in your way" (read some of the posts on orchestralist to see how the major publishers still can't do customer service properly, can't even answer a simple "is this aria available as a separate rental" question without screwing things up).

If you're talking about sales, the same situation exists there for the major composers and the vast libraries in both the orchestral and band worlds. Hal Leonard and Warner Brothers control something like 90% of the band music world, and I don't know how much of orchestral music sales.

Small publishers have a very hard time in the major markets of band music and orchestral literature. In smaller niche markets such as specific ensembles, where it's easier to spread the word to potential customers, such as flute choirs, it's much easier to make a go of things.

But trying to get your publications even known about in the band or orchestral world is next to impossible without very expensive mailings or getting your music sold at the big distributors such as JWPepper or Luck's Music Library.

This computer-technology aspect HAS had a beneficial effect where some publishers (notably C.L. Barnhouse in the band world) who were smart enough not to sell their last copy of each publication, have undertaken to digitize their entire corporate output and make out-of-print music available once again on a print-on-demand archive system.





With the advent of so many doing research and essentially able to print their own scores, and bypass
the large publishers, has this had any impact on the industry?

You still can't publish your own version of copyrighted music, so I would say that the big publishers are still the big publishers and the little guy still has a massive struggle to get known.




I know that in the United States, there are fewer and fewer publishers of classical music scores (technically there aren't any US based labels now that RECORD classical music for that matter), so with fewer and fewer publishing houses,
would the advent of small presses be a good thing?

Only if they publish music anybody wants to play. There are thousands of self-published composers who never get any sales because they haven't got the capital to do any sort of advertising campaign to drive potential customers to their web-sites.

Sort of the "all dressed up with nowhere to go" syndrome of the computer age. Beautifully engraved scores (some of them) of fine music (some of it) but no way the intended marketplace will ever know about it.



Supposedly computers and the Internet is the great democracy of things (blogs versus traditional mainstream media), mp3 swapping versus buying cds in stores, artists recording and offering their own music on personal websites etc. Has anything like this happened with music and Finale (or any music publication software such as Finale)

Sibelius has a good on-line component in it's Scorch software plug-in, and there are some Scorch-driven web-sites (jwpepper uses it to sell immediate-download-and-print-once music) which are generating sales, but Finale, as far as I can tell, has had no major impact on the publishing business, nor in actually increasing the ability of small, unknown composers or publishers to generate sales.

And with the amount of work necessary to typeset a band or orchestra score in Finale (or Sibelius) it's hardly comparable to people taking a few seconds to rip a commercial CD to mp3 files and making them available in a huge piracy scheme to the whole world.





Thanks!

--
Kim Patrick Clow
"There's really only two types of music: good and bad." ~ Rossini

Were Rossini alive today, he'd have to amend that statement:

"There's really only three types of music: good, bad and that which will never be known because the publishers/composers can't figure out how to get the music before the right market."
--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to