me either, Darcy. In a case not long ago, with a composer we eventually decided to publish, this issue came up. In order to avoid all confusion we simply decided to show the beat unit's metronome markings at the beginning of each of the two affected sections. I'm still not sure the composer was convinced the more recommended method was OK to use, despite lots of evidence provided to support it. This person was schooled in the traditional method and just wasn't comfortable with the change. The compromise is clear, of course, so everyone's happy now.
To stay even more OnT with Finale-- it's nice that one has only to set up the arrow and notes the first time, and then just use that shape as a template, changing the note values and adding or deleting dots as required. Cecil Rigby [EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal) www.harrockhall.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Yes, but I *really* don't recommend the traditional notation. > > - Darcy > > > Both Heussenstamm and Read show the equal sign centered on the > > barline only > > when arrows are being used in the more modern approach. (see my > > earlier > > msg......) > > The traditional notation showed all examples with the first note > > placed over > > the new meter. > > > > Cecil _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
