On 18 Feb 2006 at 11:08, Johannes Gebauer wrote: > On 17.02.2006 David W. Fenton wrote: > > But perhaps they were wrong and you, the non-lawyer who lives > > outside the UK, actually understand the applicable law better than > > sitting UK judges. > > Here we go again, David Fenton on another crusade. . . .
You refuse to read the factual documents on which the discussion is based. You continue to make assertions that don't reflect the facts involved. I have only called you on these acts. Either you're using the relevant facts in your posts or you're not -- you pretty clearly are not, and I'm just saying so explicitly. I haven't called you names, I haven't insulted you. All I have done is point out that you are arguing your side of the discussion without reference to any of the facts involved. > . . . Is there actually any way you can have a discussion without > getting offensive and out of order? I have not done anything at all to cause offense, other than pointing out that you are discussing the issues without having bothered to acquaint yourself with the facts involved. If it's offensive for me to tell the truth about that, well, then I don't know how I could ever post without at some point offending somebody. -- David W. Fenton http://dfenton.com David Fenton Associates http://dfenton.com/DFA/ _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
