On 18 Feb 2006 at 11:08, Johannes Gebauer wrote:

> On 17.02.2006 David W. Fenton wrote:
> > But perhaps they were wrong and you, the non-lawyer who lives
> > outside the UK, actually understand the applicable law better than
> > sitting UK judges.
> 
> Here we go again, David Fenton on another crusade. . . .

You refuse to read the factual documents on which the discussion is 
based. 

You continue to make assertions that don't reflect the facts 
involved.

I have only called you on these acts. Either you're using the 
relevant facts in your posts or you're not -- you pretty clearly are 
not, and I'm just saying so explicitly. I haven't called you names, I 
haven't insulted you. All I have done is point out that you are 
arguing your side of the discussion without reference to any of the 
facts involved.

> . . . Is there actually any way you can have a discussion without
> getting offensive and out of order?

I have not done anything at all to cause offense, other than pointing 
out that you are discussing the issues without having bothered to 
acquaint yourself with the facts involved. If it's offensive for me 
to tell the truth about that, well, then I don't know how I could 
ever post without at some point offending somebody.

-- 
David W. Fenton                    http://dfenton.com
David Fenton Associates       http://dfenton.com/DFA/

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to