On 18 Feb 2006 at 6:16, Richard Yates wrote: > > David W. Fenton wrote: > > > But perhaps they were wrong and you, the non-lawyer who lives > > > outside the UK, actually understand the applicable law better than > > > sitting UK judges. > > > > Is there actually any > > way you can have a discussion without getting offensive and out of > > order? Johannes > > I agree. After a long, informative, and civilized thread this one went > over the edge from evidence, reason, and substance and into personal > attack through sarcasm. David, can you recognize this line?
Pardon me, but Johannes has been making assertions about the facts involved (UK law, what the relevant statutes were, etc.) and admits he can't be bothered to read the documents that were being discussed. When I point this out in order to demonstrate that his arguments cannot be persuasive (and are irrelevant, being based on his disregard for the facts), *I'm* the one who is at fault? This is ridiculous. I didn't call anyone names. I didn't insult anyone. I pointed out his lack of facts and his errors in regard to assertions of fact. If that's offensive to people on this list, then those people are completely hopeless. -- David W. Fenton http://dfenton.com David Fenton Associates http://dfenton.com/DFA/ _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
