Dean,
I'm jumping in here. As far as I know, there's no longer any
advantage to Speedy Entry (except for me, because it's what I know,
and learning new ways of operating Finale can be painful), and Simple
Entry has some distinct advantages (dynamics and articulations can be
added in the note entry process without switching tools).
One of these days, I'll have to make the change. Old habits die hard.
Chuck
On Mar 11, 2006, at 8:11 AM, Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Ah, Darcy ... you are absolute correct. It works fine in Simple
Entry. I haven't thought this through yet, but if Simple can do all
that stuff, what advantage does Speedy have (if any)?
Dean
On Mar 10, 2006, at 9:46 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
Dean,
SIMPLE entry. MakeMusic doesn't even demonstrate Speedy at
workshops anymore.
- Darcy
-----
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://secretsociety.typepad.com
Brooklyn, NY
On 10 Mar 2006, at 10:41 PM, Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
BTW, I went to a Finale session at a conference yesterday, and a
Make Music fellow said, if I heard it correctly, that in speedy
entry (Fin2006), if one wished to enter a note pattern like 8th
note, 8th rest, etc., with a synthesizer, that all one had to do
was select 4, play the desired note, then simply hit zero and the
8th rest would appear. That doesn't happen for me. Did I
misunderstand him?
Dean
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Chuck Israels
230 North Garden Terrace
Bellingham, WA 98225-5836
phone (360) 671-3402
fax (360) 676-6055
www.chuckisraels.com
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
