On 27.04.2006 Jonathan Smith wrote:
You should stick with your tried and trusted 'long winded' method like I have.
You would have already saved yourself time.
I was pulled up for suggesting this only a few digests back - but there you go,
each to his own method!
Finalescript - not that simple is it really guys?
That's just like saying, you can save time by not programming a macro
which will, once you got to work, save you more time than the time you
would have saved.
You were not pulled up for suggesting this, only the question at the
time was "how do you do it in Finalescript" and you replied "don't use
it", which didn't answer the question. You are now doing exactly the
same again.
If John can solve the problems he is having with Finalescript, he might
be able to save a lot of time in the future. Of course, he could instead
just save the time on finding the solution, but then he will waste a lot
more time in the future.
Unfortunately I do not know the answer to John's problem. But I am sure
if it can be solved, John could save at least 10 seconds on every
booklet he will ever print in the future. Which, if he prints as many as
I do, will be a lot of life time.
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
