On 10 May 2006 at 17:39, Johannes Gebauer wrote: > On 10.05.2006 David W. Fenton wrote: > > One thing that bothers me about staff lines is that the thickness > > remains constant even for reduced staves, but staff lines are > > reduced in size. I can understand why, but it doesn't look right to > > my eye. It seems to me that barlines that are entirely within a > > staff group that has the same % reduction should be reduced > > accordingly. > > It took me a while to work out what you meant, I guess you mean > barlines in the first line. . . .
No, I mean all barlines in the reduced staves, not just the first one (which *can't* have reduced width, as it runs through all staves). > . . . Personally I think the way they do it is > right, I wouldn't want different thicknesses of barlines in different > parts. Well, it seems to me that if the staff lines are thinner, it looks wrong for the barlines to not be thinner. But I actually wish the staff lines weren't thinner in reduced staves, either. -- David W. Fenton http://dfenton.com David Fenton Associates http://dfenton.com/DFA/ _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
