On 7/20/06, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Saur can copyright the images themselves -- not their content, which can be
copied out by hand or transcribed by an OCR program.
I understand the logic about not copying the photograph, which is Saur's copyrighted material.
A copy would be essentially duplicating their materials, but why would OCRing material be ok?
Isn't that essentially a mechnical reproduction of the photograph?
Thanks!
Kim Patrick Clow
Kim Patrick Clow
_______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
