On Jul 25, 2006, at 6:29 AM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:

On 20.07.2006 Andrew Stiller wrote:
Under US copyright law, the only thing Saur can copyright about such a collection of PD material is the collection itself--that is, the selection and ordering of the contents. If you don't copy that (that is to say, the whole damn collection, or a *really* substantial portion of it) you are totally in the clear--and in the right too.

Not that I am any expert on this, but I think that there are exceptions for this kinds of prints, especially if no other edition, facsimile or engraved, exists. This may very well count as the very first publication (even if individual pieces have been in print in the past or present), and it could be, that the library gave the publication rights to Saur. In that case you may very well be violating their copyright by photocopying from the facsimile.

Under US law, mere ownership of an MS conveys no intellectual property rights in it, and first publications of PD material are copyrightable only insofar as something new (not including typography and layout) is added to what may be found in the MS. The copyright in such an edition belongs to the creator of that edition absolutely, and does not require the approval of the library holding the MS. I have published numerous such editions, and believe me, I know what I'm talking about.

It is considered polite to ask libraries before publicly reproducing PD material from their collections, and to give them due credit in writing for the usage--but there is no legal obligation whatsoever to do so.

Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to