Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 08 Aug 2006, at 8:26 PM, dhbailey wrote:
AJ Azure wrote:
No one is mentioning this but, I can make it much simpler for you
all. MACS
are better. One reason? The new platform runs OSX AND WinXP. PCs
can't do
that yet right? If you need dual platform for work and/or you may want
software that one or the other does not run. MACS are the only answer.
And why is that? If, as it appears from what Darcy is saying, the new
Mac Pros are the same machines which can run Windows except that they
come with Mac OSx instead, why can't I simply buy OSx and install it
on my windows machine as a dual-boot system? Why do I have to buy a Mac?
Because it would not be profitable for Apple to allow OS X to be
installed on non-Apple hardware. It may be good for you, but it would be
terrible for Apple's bottom line.
You mean that a company can't make a fortune (the world's richest man,
as far as I can recall, made his fortune by selling an OS which wasn't
tethered to a specific make of computer) by simply selling an OS? You
can't really be telling me that Apple is a bigger financial giant than
Microsoft, can you?
How would it be terrible for Apple's bottom line?
--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
