--- "David W. Fenton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> None of that makes any sense. Why would an installer > check the RAM > available when it's *running* rather than the > *installed* RAM? > Perhaps you're right, though, if the system RAM > grabbed by the > onboard devices is showing up as unavailable. I > don't know how those > kinds of things work, since I'd never buy a system > that is so poorly > designed as to be using system RAM for those > purposes. I believe if you look at the amount of memory reported by Windows as being installed on the system, system memory that has been dedicated to video will not be reported. So a system with 256MB of Ram with integrated video that uses 32MB from this will only report that it has 224MB of memory. If the program isn't installing and is reporting that the computer doesn't have enough memory, this would be my guess as to what's going on. -Tyler __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
