On 20.08.2006 dc wrote:
Johannes Gebauer écrit:
Well, personally I don't think it needs an interpretation, it just needs to be
notated exactly as in the scource. That way the interpretation is left ot the
performer, and that's how it should be.
I disagree. I think it's up to the editor, after examining the manuscript, to
decide what was meant. He can always mention in critical notes the original
notation if he thinks it is ambiguous (which I don't think is the case here).
If the performer doesn't have access to the source, how can he know if the
vertical alignment is generally respected or not in the notation?
The problem is notating it in a part, where it will always look like the first
32nd is on the second beat.
Where it should be, in my opinion.
Having looked at it a little more, I think you are correct. There seems
to be no line up in the rest of the excerpt.
However, I am not convinced the editor should always make decisions...
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
