Johannes,

I built my tape recorders. But then I didn't have to make a living :-).

I know, notation software is not trivial. But asking for the obvious
isn't trivial either. Yeah, one can find all kinds of loopholes:
the market is too small, the program is complicated, the programming
expensive, marketing costs, advertising. Surely, but these are the risks
of running a business. I remember when selling computer software. People
were constantly asking why they had to buy a separate word processor, a
separate spread sheet, why the database wasn't communicating with the
spreadsheet (a very obvious question), etc. Remember Word Perfect? Very
good processor. It still exists, but it's just a word processor. Word
Star and other single packages fell by the wayside once Microsoft got
their act together. Programming language packages on the other had
started out complete. Think about it: what if the word processor,
libraries, kernel and compiler would have all come in separate boxes? Or
the elements of  an operating system would have to be bought  in separate
chunks, the user interface, printing, kernel, libraries (dll), the
registry and so many other elements, Internet interface, communications,
etc, etc. I think computing would still be in the DOS age and a very
exasperating experience.

John. 

On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 00:53:02 +0200 Johannes Gebauer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 06.10.2006 John T Sylvanis wrote:
> > Maybe I want too much, but I think my quest is not at all 
> unreasonable
> > when suggesting unification such that a package comports GOOD 
> notation,
> > GOOD sequencing and GOOD sapling on par with GOOD sequencing 
> software,
> > GOOD notation software and GOOD sampling software, and all of 
> these
> > COMPLETE. 
> > 
> How about programming it yourself? I am sure it would sell well 
> enough...
> 
> Johannes
> 
> -- 
> http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
> http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Finale mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to