On 21 Mar 2007 at 18:25, Darcy James Argue wrote: > So, in your example, the measure under the first ending is m.16, the > measure under the second ending is m.17, and the first measure > following the second ending is m.18.
I would do that in the vast majority of situations. The one exception would be a binary form with clear 8- or 16-bar sections, where the numbers will then come out wrong if you count the 2nd endings. If the B section begins in measure 10 instead of measure 9, it will confuse those who are accustomed to the conventions of these historical forms. -- David W. Fenton http://dfenton.com David Fenton Associates http://dfenton.com/DFA/ _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
