Come on, now. If Phil doesn't want people to pile on, he shouldn't
deliberately go around pushing buttons. He *wanted* to stir up
trouble, and he got what he wanted. I personally think it's a
complete waste of time to engage him on anything, but others are free
to do as they wish, and I absolutely understand why many here didn't
want to leave his words unchallenged.
But really, there's nothing more annoying than someone appointing
themselves list schoolmarm. Scolding others for their lack of
"civility" gets old, fast. Heat, kitchen, etc.
Cheers,
- Darcy
-----
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 26 May 2007, at 4:31 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 5/25/2007 6:49:25 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Phil hasn't staked out a position except "I don't like this music,
therefore it's bad music." Yet, he insists that it's a defensible
position. Something
is wrong with this picture, but it's not that people are pointing
out the
flaws in Phil's stated position.
OK, OK--so there are *two* things wrong with it: the above, and the
fact that
it's turned into a ridiculously over-determined gang-up on Phil.
One or two
posts saying, "You're full of it" should have been sufficient.
Now that I've posted three times, violating my own rule, I'll exit
stage
right.
David Lawrence ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
**************************************
See
what's free at http://www.aol.com.
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
