On 18 Jul 2007 at 13:51, dhbailey wrote:

> David W. Fenton wrote:
> > On 18 Jul 2007 at 12:01, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
> > 
> >> The spacing on mine is still in draft mode, but yes, it is spaced
> >> by hand. All automatic features are turned off, and the work is
> >> being done in page mode with the measures pre-locked via "fit
> >> music".
> > 
> > Well, my point is that while the basic overall layout is matched,
> > the details of the music are not nearly as finished as yours. He
> > didn't even enter the music for the bottom half of the page.
> > 
> > What bothers me other than the overall not great look of the music
> > font (and many outstandingly bad details, like the rests I
> > mentioned) is that the spacing of the notes in the flute line is so
> > *bad* -- it's neither metric nor set by the widths of the
> > characters. Any of Finale's default spacing algorithms looks better
> > than that, so it bothers me that two hours of work on the Sibelius
> > page produces such widely varying spacing. It's not that it doesn't
> > replicate yours, but that it isn't internally consistent with itself
> > (which yours actually is, and which Finale would make happen
> > automatically).
> 
> And the Sibelius person spent 2 hours while Dennis has admitted
> spending 4 hours -- who is to say whether or not the spacing would be
> precisely what Dennis achieved in 4 hours, if the Sibelius person had
> spent 2 more hours doing it.

But he didn't enter half the music!

And my bet is that the in-measure spacing for the flute part did not 
take Dennis very long (though he may have had to manually define the 
measure widths).

-- 
David W. Fenton                    http://dfenton.com
David Fenton Associates       http://dfenton.com/DFA/

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to