I am a only-Sibelius user, but I like to read this list, because it keeps
me informed, and the level of the notesetting-related themes is much more
interesting than in the other sibelius lists (for several reasons, which I
won't explain now).
I would second David's point - if you're discussing Finale, you must
discuss sibelius, specially now, where both programs are competing on a
feature-to-feature basis. (you could also discuss other music notation
softwares, but they're not really interesting enough for that). Or do you
also try to stop people or segregate them when someone asks for a model of
a binder, in which paper thickness should orchestral parts be made, or
which pdf or font editing programm should be bought?
And you guys have been taking lots of abuse from makemusic from a long
time, maybe seeing the word "sibelius" on the themes of several posts
might wake them up a bit (if there's hope for it).
It might be a better idea to have a switchers or dual users list, one
where people who are familiar with both and use both can discuss and
what not
I want the discussion to continue here, on the Finale list, because
the topic *is* Finale, or how Finale can continue to exist in the
face of competition that is executing better than MakeMusic has
recently.
--
Friedenstr. 58
10249 Berlin
Deutschland
Tel +49 30 42020091
Mob +49 162 6843570
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
skype: jmmmpjmmmp
http://www.puredata.org/Members/jmmmp
IBM Thinkpad R51, XP, Pd-Ext-0.39-2-t5, Pd Van 0.40-t2
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
