I just had a conversation with my copyist/engraver friend in Vancouver about this. He has had to use Sibelius for some jobs over the past year, so he is now familiar with it as well as being a Finale expert. His description of Sibelius' qualities is interesting. He has gone from being frustrated with it to finding it full of things that are more easily done than in Finale - page layout, for one, is easier, attached items show up not only with attachment lines a la Finale 2009 but also with distances from the staff visibly marked, keyboard shortcuts are set up as toggle switches when that is a useful behavior, and all kinds of things can be entered at once without switching tools - even more than Finale's Simple Entry (if I understand him correctly) . BUT, time value selection precedes pitch (and that's the only way it can work in Sibelius), and that is a deal breaker for me. When Finale catches up (as it seems to have done pretty well in Simple Entry) AND provides the same functionality either in Speedy, or in Simple with a pitch before duration option, we may have the best of both worlds. Greg has become fluent in data entry in Sibelius, but he is copying existing manuscripts, so the "thought process" order doesn't matter. He can enter the duration first with no hitch in his thinking. For me, as a composer/arranger, that doesn't work, so I don't get the conventional wisdom that Sibleius is for composers and Finale is for copyists.

Long live Speedy (with improvements, we hope) or an option in Simple that makes it work for all of us Speedy habitués.

Chuck


On Aug 1, 2008, at 4:54 PM, Matthew Hindson fastmail acct wrote:

OK, not aiming to revisit old wounds - but I thought I would share one aspect of my recent experience of teaching a class of mainly- Finale-newbies to the application.

For the note-entry method, I showed them how to use Speedy, and what the keystrokes meant and did. In 5 minutes they were entering a Haydn string quartet movement, and at a surprisingly quick rate. This was without a MIDI keyboard.

I hope that MakeMusic still realises that Speedy is a really excellent tool for note entry that is (in my opinion) considerably more straightforward than using Simple without a MIDI keyboard. Speedy seems a better balance of simplicity and power. Because there are fewer options as compared to Simple, there are fewer keystrokes to come to grips with as a beginner - but the options that are there are easy to use and powerful enough to enter all pitches and rhythms you want.

Plus Speedy is great because it provides the user with the option to select pitch then enter rhythm for note entry.

Mind you, it would be good to able to change clef from within Speedy I suppose. Maybe press ? and a list of clefs pops up. This would be relevant to the tool because it relates to pitch.

Anyway, in the end I just hope that Finale doesn't consider removing or crippling Speedy. It really is an excellent and easy-to-use tool.

Matthew
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Chuck Israels
230 North Garden Terrace
Bellingham, WA 98225-5836
phone (360) 671-3402
fax (360) 676-6055
www.chuckisraels.com


_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to