Not necessarily......For example, when I am writing out something, I frequently go through and block out chords, then go back and do the duration. And speedy also lets me play or even keep sounding the chord before and lets me play/mess around with different voicings before putting them into the score.

Finale is flexible enough to allow that, and that is why I continue to use it despite the fact that the company seems to have its head up its.......yeah

On 5/31/09 5:43 PM, John Howell wrote:
I fully realize that different people have different ways of working, but I find this particular argument (duration before pitch or pitch before duration) rather amusing. In hand copying (remember doing THAT, anyone?!!), you do both simultaneously, placing a note on a line or space and making it black or white, and then finish up the details. And that goes clear back to monks with featers! Any computer program breaks that down and requires doing one and then the other. Big deal! The human mind is really a bit more flexible that that.

I used Mosaic for years, and I honestly can't remember the order for entry. Duration first, I think, using the number keys, then pitch entry (which would make it more similar to Sibelius), but I honestly can't remember how the pitch was entered, except that mousing it (as always) was the least desirable option. (So soon we forget!!) But I can't remember getting emotionally involved about it, either.

John



_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to