I was not suggesting that playback be eliminated.  That is an essential 
feature.  However, for all of the talk over the years about realistic 
playback, my experience is that the most basic things (like getting 
swing to work consistently) requires all sorts of fiddling, making the 
notion of "human playback" pretty much out of the question for me.  I 
have heard various examples the company has posted over the years that 
do indeed sound rather realistic.  I can only imagine somebody spent an 
enormous amount of time tweaking those scores because mine surely don't 
sound anything like that.

I cannot see myself ever producing a finished audio product within 
Finale, so I'd rather see them put that effort into fixing the many bugs 
and annoyances in the basic product.


On 7/24/2012 3:04 PM, Raymond Horton wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Craig Parmerlee <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I'd rather see them get all in or get
>> out with regard to realistic playback.
> I really do not think eliminating playback, or scaling back progress
> in this area, would be a sensible move.
>
>
> Raymond Horton
> Bass Trombonist, Louisville Orchestra
> Minister of Music, Edwardsville (IN) UMC
> Composer, Arranger
> VISIT US AT rayhortonmusic.com
> _______________________________________________
> Finale mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
>
>

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to