On some levels I agree. In theory I like all in one. But that usually isn't the end result. One is always lacking. Compromise is usually required you end up with a program that is impossible to learn I'm happy with XML to go back and forth when needed.
------------------------------ On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 4:30 AM PDT Steve Parker wrote: >Maybe I'm alone in not wanting every program to do everything.. > >If I need to mock up or (increasingly) produce a high-quality audio version of >something then Digital Performer is perfect. >If I need players to play it or it needs to be published then I want absolute >control over what it looks like with the program making the best stab possible >at it before tweaking. > >I don't want the two to meet and I don't expect to ever see a notation app >that doesn't need tweaking (in every bar...) > >Otherwise we end up with 'good' notation or 'good' arranging, but never the >kind of counter-intuitive rule-breaking that makes something great. > >Steve P. > > > >_______________________________________________ >Finale mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale > _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
