Could you elaborate on what you find lacking in Finale's linked parts vs.
Sib. (or even Dorico)? Some of that lack might be addressable with a plugin.

On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 9:02 AM, David H. Bailey <
[email protected]> wrote:

> There are professional engraving projects being done with Dorico. If you
> want to see what it is capable of there are many youtube videos addressing
> various aspects of Dorico, and I would say that it is indeed capable of
> very elegant professional, publishable output.
>
> Yes, you read that one of the Dorico users exports to Finale for the
> finished product -- I haven't read on the Dorico forum that there are
> others who do that.  I do know there are lots like me who are continuing to
> work in our notation software of choice while learning the intricacies of
> Dorico.  I wonder if exporting to Finale simply makes things easier for
> that person because of a workflow developed over many years of using
> Finale, while he is learning the more intricate details of the workflow in
> Dorico to get the same output.
>
> I would say that Dorico is as much a truly professional music engraving
> tool as Sibelius was when it entered the Windows/Mac marketplace. Several
> publishers, if I remember correctly, began using it at that time instead of
> Finale, while some other publishers added Sibelius to their toolbox and
> used both.
>
> A lot depends on how one defines  "truly professional" -- it's certainly
> much more professional than either Notion or Forte, two other recent
> entries into the notation software marketplace, and despite major advances
> with MuseScore, Dorico is capable of producing much more elegant printed
> output.  And it's capable of producing output as elegant as Finale's
> output.  I don't work in avant-garde notation so I can't speak to either
> Dorico or Sibelius or Finale regarding the ability to accomplish such
> projects.
>
> I hope I'm wrong about Finale and that your thoughts are more accurate,
> but to be honest I don't see much advancement in Finale from Finale2014.5
> to Finale25.  Linked score/parts didn't suddenly become superb and very
> efficient.  I still find Sibelius's linked score/parts to be much more
> efficient and easier to use.
>
> But I know that you and Chuck Israel and many others are producing great
> output with Finale, and I hope development continues, with some major
> improvements coming soon.  Not only do Finale users need and deserve this
> sort of thing, but the marketplace does also.  Finale used to lead, then
> Sibelius hit the marketplace and suddenly Finale was playing catch-up with
> Sibelius.  Will it need to play catch-up with Dorico as well as Sibelius
> now?  Or will Finale leap ahead with the next version and force Sibelius
> and Dorico to catch up to it?
>
> Of course what I'm saying about Finale is also true about Sibelius -- I
> have heard nothing about Sibelius 8 or 8.5 to make me want to upgrade from
> 7.1.3, and ever since the takeover by Avid I have been worried about future
> development of Sibelius.
>
> And ultimately it all boils down to each of us finding and using the tools
> which allow us to get the desired result with the minimum of effort for us
> so that most of our effort can be put into the creative side of things.
>
>
>
> On 4/21/2018 8:33 AM, Robert Patterson wrote:
>
>>  > And with the entry of Dorico at the truly professional music engraving
>> level
>>
>> Wait. Is Dorico at the truly professional level? All I've heard is that
>> it has the potential to be but isn't there yet. I mean, one of the Dorico
>> users in this thread even said they export to Finale for the finished
>> product. (Which surprised me.)
>>
>> Everything I've heard about the most recent owners of Finale is that they
>> are quite interested in it. But I haven't heard much about it in recent
>> months. I hope Michael Johnson's departure was for personal reasons rather
>> than due to a direction the owners are taking. Meanwhile the rest of the
>> team (as far as I can tell) seems really engaged and forward looking.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 4:12 AM, David H. Bailey <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>     On 4/20/2018 7:13 PM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
>>
>>         I take your point that they "could" do some of the abstraction
>>         that is
>>         inherent in the newer programs.  I am not seeing anything that
>>         suggests
>>         to me they are at all interested in matching up to Dorico.
>>  Indeed, the
>>         only recent statements I could find were very much oriented to
>>         SmartMusic and not Finale.  If they actually are making a
>>         significant
>>         investment in the program (which I question), I suggest it would
>>         be wise
>>         for them to take note of the major advances in the past 2 years
>>         in both
>>         Dorico and Sibelius, and communicate much more openly with the
>>         Finale
>>         user base.
>>
>>     [snip]
>>
>>     Back when Coda was the owner and Finale was the major product, they
>>     knew they had to keep communicating with users and work hard to keep
>>     the program growing in order to satisfy their user base and attract
>>     new users.  But with virtually no competition in the Windows area at
>>     that time they were the program that any newcomer had to beat.
>>
>>     With the various owners the product has had along the way, coupled
>>     with the development of a new cash-cow (smartmusic) Finale has been
>>     pushed aside somewhat, seemingly more with each new owner, and
>>     improved mainly so that it could create more and better smartmusic
>>     accompaniments in addition to producing publication-ready engraved
>>     music.  To that end, whoever owned the program worked to improve the
>>     program in obvious ways again to keep the user base somewhat
>>     satisfied and also in an attempt to attract new users but mainly to
>>     benefit the SmartMusic marketplace.
>>
>>     But the current owners are not musicians, they were not involved in
>>     the music field at all before the acquisition of Finale and
>>     SmartMusic. Their athletic-training background sees a good fit for
>>     SmartMusic since it's a training software, just for musicians
>>     instead of athletes.  And so Finale tags along because without it
>>     there can't be any new SmartMusic accompaniments created.  But
>>     Finale upgrades generate an unpredictable amount of income and then
>>     only when the new version comes out -- once it's out and those who
>>     will upgrade have done so, there's very little cash-flow in the
>>     product.  Especially with the less-expensive (free) but very capable
>>     MuseScore attracting ever larger numbers of people who formerly
>>     would have had to purchase either Finale or Sibelius (i.e. music
>>     students and recent graduates of music schools/colleges), Finale's
>>     market share among notation software users is constantly shrinking.
>>    And with the entry of Dorico at the truly professional music
>>     engraving level the potential user base is diluted even further and
>>     the recent entry of Forte and Notion is attracting those potential
>>     users who don't want to spend a lot of money and who formerly would
>>     have purchased the cheaper versions of Finale.
>>
>>     But SmartMusic remains the only product of its kind and it has major
>>     educational market music publishers sewn up. With the annual
>>     subscription the only business model and schools willing to budget
>>     for it so that teachers have clearly objective ways of measuring
>>     student ability (there's no disputing when SmartMusic records a
>>     student's performance and gives a concrete number of mistakes), it
>>     is a golden cash-cow.
>>
>>     We have to remember that in the early days of Finale when Coda was
>>     run by musicians who cared about making a product that could serve
>>     them as well as the user base the thrust of the company was to make
>>     a product that filled a need.
>>
>>     These days when the company is no longer run by musicians but
>>     instead by accountants and entrepreneurs for whom the bottom line is
>>     the most important attribute of a product, the product isn't being
>>     made to fulfill their dream of usefulness, only to fulfill their
>>     dream of larger profits.  So as long as SmartMusic remains
>>     profitable and as long as Finale is the only way to create
>>     SmartMusic accompaniments, Finale will remain viable to the company
>>     but not a great income generator in and of itself.  If it were a
>>     larger income generator it wouldn't be getting sold every few years.
>>
>>
>>     --     *****
>>
>>     David H. Bailey
>>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     http://www.davidbaileymusicstudio.com
>>     <http://www.davidbaileymusicstudio.com>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> David H. Bailey
> [email protected]
> http://www.davidbaileymusicstudio.com
>
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
[email protected]

Reply via email to