It's fine. Some package likely isn't compatible with netpbm-10.x, so netpbm-9 is being retained, and a separate netpbm10 package was made for packages that can use a later netpbm.
On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 07:10, Jim Saklad wrote: > From Fink Commander's display: > > name installed stable unstable status > netpbm 9.25-3 9.25-1 9.25-3 outdated > netpbm-bin 10.12-2 10.12-1 10.12-2 outdated > netpbm-shlibs 9.25-3 9.25-1 9.25-3 outdated > netpbm10-shlibs 10.12-2 10.12-1 10.12-2 outdated > netpbm10 10.12-2 10.12-1 10.12-2 > > Is it normal for netpbm and netpbm10 both to be installed, or should > one replace the other? > > -- > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Jim Saklad mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! > http://www.vasoftware.com > _______________________________________________ > Fink-beginners mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners -- Alexander K. Hansen Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center Levitated Dipole Experiment 175 Albany Street, NW17-219 Cambridge, MA 02139-4213 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Fink-beginners mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners
