By default you wouldn't have anything there; and sometimes libraries in /usr/local/lib take precedence over those in /sw/lib, causing similar problems to what you saw.
Can you make another attempt to upgrade libiconv (possibly using gcc 3.1) and post the output to the mailing list? It may be something that's been seen before. -- Alexander K. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 18:50, Charles Baldwin wrote: > As a matter of fact, I do not. I thought perhaps I would but > checking I verified that both /usr/local/lib and /usr/local/include > are empty directories. My question now would be, should I have > something in them? You'll have to forgive a newbie. The last time I > did any programming it was in Fortran on IBM keypunch cards. > > I don't want to beat a dead horse, but I do think it's important that > this breakage occurred prior to installing the gcc3.3 update. In > fact, it was the very reason I installed the update. > > > On 2003.08.20 (16:53 -0400), Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > > >By any chance, do you have any libraries in /usr/local/lib? > > > >On Wednesday, August 20, 2003, at 04:45 PM, Charles Baldwin wrote: > > > >> > >> This is more on the bug I posted recently. The problem seems to be > >> with libiconv-1.7-7. fink can't complete the build due to an > >> erroneous directory reference. I can build, check and install it by > > > hand without any problems. However, here's the kicker ... Once it is > [Edited] > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0 _______________________________________________ Fink-beginners mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners
