On 6-Apr-04, at 14:48, Darian Lanx wrote:
Stan Sanderson wrote:
<snip>Using the unstable tree has risks, which I accept.Just out of curiosity, which risks are you reffering to? Our unstable tree could be considered by the following definition of the word:
d (1) : liable to change or alteration.
The software itself should not be less stable than the one found in the stable tree.
This is an interesting assertion. How do you reach that conclusion?
Cheers, Lloyd
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-beginners mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners
