The primary "risk" is that the package won't actually build for some reason.

On Apr 6, 2004, at 2:48 PM, Darian Lanx wrote:

Stan Sanderson wrote:

<snip>
Using the unstable tree has risks, which I accept.
Just out of curiosity, which risks are you reffering to? Our unstable tree could be considered by the following definition of the word:
d (1) : liable to change or alteration.


The software itself should not be less stable than the one found in the stable tree.

:)

-d


------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-beginners mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners

--
Alexander K. Hansen
Fink Documentarian
Day Job:  Levitated Dipole Experiment
http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Fink-beginners mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners

Reply via email to