Hi,
I checked the .info file of automake 1.6 in both the stable and unstable branches of 10.2-gcc3.3, and in both, 'Source' is actually tar.bz2
here's the info:
unstable Source: mirror:gnu:automake/automake-%v.tar.bz2
stable Source: mirror:gnu:automake/automake-%v.tar.bz2
>I think you're right--I just tried to do a fetch
>
>
>
>On May 2, 2004, at 7:43 PM, Iván Esquinca Yáńez wrote:
>
>>I tried to remove the version 1.8 of automake(the first I got
>>installed, before the attempt to install KDE ), and well it was
>>removed, with the installation of the 1.6 version, then it was
>>archived. I tried to remove the configuration files of the 1.8 ver.
>>with 'fink purge automake1.8', but it print that the pakage is not
>>installed(eventough I have the 'archived' status of the package in
>>the fink comander).
>
>'archived' means you have a .deb file for the package on your
>system, ready to be reinstalled if needed. It's fine.
>
>>then I try to 'upgrade' the automake1.6.3-3 to 1.6.3-5 and I think
>>that perhaps the problem is not in 'automake1.6.3-3'(the one I got
>>installed), but the upgrading package 'automake1.6.3-5'.
>>I got the same message:
>>
>
>Yes, that seems right.
>
>>The following package will be installed or updated:
>>automake
>>Failed: file download failed for automake-1.6.3.tar.gz of package
>>automake-1.6.3-5
>>
>
>I just tried "fink fetch automake1.6" and got the following possibly
>relevant information:
>
>$ fink fetch automake1.6
>/usr/bin/sudo /sw/bin/fink fetch automake1.6
>Information about 3100 packages read in 6 seconds.
>
>(1) Delete it and download again
>(2) Assume it is a partial download and try to continue
>(3) Don't download, use existing file
>
>The file "automake-1.6.3.tar.bz2" already exists, how do you want to
>proceed?
>[1]
>
>(I'm on Panther, so my .info file may be different). It may be that
>there isn't a .tar.gz file, but only a .tar.bz2. Check out the
>.info file for automake1.6 on your system and see what the Source:
>line says.
>
>>anyway I dont know, how can I just make KDE get installed properly?
>>should I remove the automake1.6 and start without any automake?
>>
>>>That looks right. I don't understand why you keep getting a
>>"file
>>>download error" message for this package.
>>>
>>>Here's a thought. What happens if you remove automake (keep
>>>automake16, I guess)?
>>>
>>>On May 2, 2004, at 10:07 AM, Iván Esquinca Yáńez wrote:
>>>
>>>>there is No source...
>>>>here's the file:
>>>>
>>>>Package: automake
>>>>Version: 1.6.3
>>>>Revision: 5
>>>>Maintainer: Chris Zubrzycki
>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>Depends: automake1.6
>>>>Type: NoSource
>>>>CompileScript: echo "Nothing to build..."
>>>>InstallScript: <<
>>>>mkdir -p %i/share/doc/%n
>>>>echo "It is safe to remove this empty package after
>>the upgrade is
>>>>complete." >
>>>>%i/share/doc/%n/README
>>>><<
>>>>Description: Upgrade package -> automake1.6
>>>>DescDetail: <<
>>>>It is safe to remove this empty package after the upgrade
>>is
>>>>complete.
>>>><<
>>>>License: GPL
>>>>Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/
>>>>Source-MD5: 2bd506db63b6d10458cb644b6171ce93
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Fotos: la forma más fácil de compartir e imprimir fotos. http://photos.msn.es/support/worldwide.aspx
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
_______________________________________________
Fink-beginners mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners
