Alexander K. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Oct 26, 2004, at 5:40 AM, Holger Schulz wrote:
>> Am 22.10.2004 um 22:21 schrieb Alexander K. Hansen:
>>>
>>> The default behavior is set by the list software--the current setup
>>> was deliberately chosen. "Reply to all" just means 2 copies of some
>>> messages and they're all supposed to be less than 40k.
>>
>> I'm not sure if I understand that. My problem is, that on replying the
>> reply mail goes to the sender only by default, not to the list. I'd
>> find it more useful to contact the whole list with answers and further
>> questions. Is it possible to set a Reply-To field in the mails of that
>> list? It seems to be possible in other lists I'm in.
>
> And the answer is: it _can_ be done, but that's a matter for the list
> administrator to set up.
I'm not sure how you read email, but I have a procmail filter that
uses formail to insert a Reply-To header. From my .procmailrc:
:0
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{
:0 fhw
| formail -i "Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
}
dan
--
Daniel Macks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
_______________________________________________
Fink-beginners mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners
