On Jan 19, 2006, at 9:21 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
[snipped original issue...]
Bumping the revision's a good idea. Also, "fink rebuild <packagename>" _should_ rebuild the package with any changes you've made to the .info file, even if you keep the same revision.
I think I can attest to that "keep the same revision" behavior still resulting in a new build, given my experience with qt3 last night, but what's a good way to deal with the fact that as soon as there's another official revision, I'm likely to want that one instead of my hack? If I bump the revision up by 1, then it will conflict immediately. If I bump it up a lot, doesn't my revision interfere with access to the new versions from the normal maintainer?
-- Alexander K. Hansen
-- David Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Fink-beginners mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners
