-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Brendan Simon wrote: > My fink is configured to use cvs. (I followed some webpage to try to > get gnucash2 on my 10.4 Intel system). > > Anyway, the build did not succeed. I also tried to build > net-snmp-unified but that also failed. > > I was wondering if using cvs is a good idea or not. Is cvs more > "unstable" than using rsync, or does it make no difference whatsoever ?? > > Thanks, Brendan. > > cvs updating was the original method. We found that the sourceforge server got overloaded fairly often and so we added rsync, which has been more reliable.
The package descriptions you get are the same either way. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHbRwNB8UpO3rKjQ8RAiN3AJsEyCdS0mQW/5Wl00yLTQhI/zWJSACfVDNc 0A8ACsSLD1EQsf5T0YY8JD4= =0wmU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Fink-beginners mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.beginners
