Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Jun 5, 2008, at 11:14 PM, Daniel E. Macks wrote: >> >> Just as a partial followup, the transiently-existing lua/lua-shlibs >> that were problematic didn't even pass 'fink validate'. The specific >> validation-failure had to do with their ability to fool 'dpkg' into >> thinking they weren't installed. > > The deb directory validator (from -m mode) didn't seem to care, though.
'fink -kKmvl --val=warn --bu rebuild lua-5.1-0' (fink CVS HEAD) just gave me: - Depends line is: lua51, darwin (>= 8-1) Writing control file... Validating .deb dir /sw/build.build/root-lua-5.1-0... Error: Package contains no files. Validation of .deb failed. I couldn't use -m without --val=warn b/c the .info doesn't pass either (but for a non-important reason). dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Fink-beginners mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.beginners
