Daniel E. Macks wrote: > Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >> On Jun 5, 2008, at 11:14 PM, Daniel E. Macks wrote: >> >>> Just as a partial followup, the transiently-existing lua/lua-shlibs >>> that were problematic didn't even pass 'fink validate'. The specific >>> validation-failure had to do with their ability to fool 'dpkg' into >>> thinking they weren't installed. >>> >> The deb directory validator (from -m mode) didn't seem to care, though. >> > > 'fink -kKmvl --val=warn --bu rebuild lua-5.1-0' (fink CVS HEAD) just > gave me: > > - Depends line is: lua51, darwin (>= 8-1) > Writing control file... > Validating .deb dir /sw/build.build/root-lua-5.1-0... > Error: Package contains no files. > Validation of .deb failed. > > I couldn't use -m without --val=warn b/c the .info doesn't pass either > (but for a non-important reason). > > dan > > Maybe I didn't do what I thought I did, then.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Fink-beginners mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.beginners
