On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 06:58:22 -0700, Alexander Hansen <alexanderk.han...@gmail.com> wrote: Should we do a quickie fink-0.39.0 release to provide support for El Capitan immediately, defer doing a full update of the internal docs in the tarball until afterward, and continue cleaning up the 10.9-libcxx tree as we go, or should we instead wait until 10.9-libcxx is nicely cleaned up? > > I’m kind of in favor of the first option, since that’ll cut down > on the “I upgraded and hosed my fink” complaints.
I favor a quick release. dists/10.9-libcxx has some dep-tree holes and obviously unknown-many 10.11-specific problems, but dists/10.7 has those same 10.11-specific problems and *also* tons of packages that we don't really want users to have to deal with at all on 10.11. dan -- Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ fink-core mailing list fink-core@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.core Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-core
