At 16:47 Uhr +1100 25.03.2002, Jeremy Higgs wrote: >On 25/3/02 5:58 AM, "Max Horn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I think we might want to define a plan as to when we will consider >> Fink to be 1.0. Some ideas of my own: >> >> >> * package caching. It's just not acceptable that one has to wait >> 10-60 seconds before the actual command is processed. >> >> * full shlibs support (that includes automatic dependency detection). >> >> >> >> Max > >Just to add to this (not sure if anyone else has mentioned it)... Having a >nice graphical front-end might also be nice. It need not be distributed with >Fink (although that would be a boon, and would encourage people who haven't >used Fink to use it), but having it there would be nice. Fink Commander >looks promising, it just needs to be refined! > >But then again, plenty of people seem to cope with the current command-line >interface, so it's not such a big deal. :)
As I told Finlay previously, I am sorry to have misexpressed myself, but I was actually refering to the package manager, for which the availability of a GUI is completly irrelevant. Cheers, Max -- ----------------------------------------------- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49) 6151-494890 _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
