On Wednesday, April 17, 2002, at 10:14 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: > Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wednesday, April 17, 2002, at 08:02 AM, Kyle Moffett wrote: >>> I would like to try to help package Apache 2.0 in Fink after I >>> get it running on my own machine, overwriting Apple's version >>> 1.3. >> >> The other day I asked about packaging later versions of perl, >> and was told that fink overwriting Apple's perl would never >> happen in a million years. Why is it different for Apache? I >> don't think I understand the policy. >> > > It's not different for Apache. A package overwriting Apple's > version would > not be accepted into Fink.
I see - so is it common for people to use "local" Fink info files in these situations, clobbering Apple stuff if desired, but not submitting them to the Fink tracker? In some situations people have no choice but to clobber at least some small part of Apple's stuff (fixing broken things, for example), and it seems like fink could play a role here in helping us keep track of what's been done, and automating the process. -Ken _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
