Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 7:22 Uhr -0400 25.04.2002, David R. Morrison wrote: > [snip] > > >So I would think that this package should be split into three pieces, > >maybe the third one to be called gdk-pixbuf-loaders. It would be treated > >like the binaries are treated in some other pakcages. Splitting it off gives > >the possibility of allowing the dkpg/shlibs system to install multiple > >versioned copies of the dylibs, without getting conflicts between .so > >files. > > I am not sure that would actually work, see above: the loadable > modules might not work with different versions of the .dylibs. >
The same is true of binaries. Here was my idea: SplitOff: << Package: %N-shlibs ... << SplitOff2: << Package: %N-loaders Depends: %N-shlibs (= %v-%r) Files: lib/gdk-pixbuf/loaders << That's what we do with binaries. Maybe the (= %v-%r) is too restrictive, but eventually that will be handled by the dpkg/shlibs system, to get the correct versions in place. Other packages would need to say "Depends: gdk-pixbuf-loaders" when appropriate. I guess we might call it gdk-pixbuf-plugins instead; that might be more clear. -- Dave _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
