Peter O'Gorman wrote: > > On Monday, September 30, 2002, at 12:40 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: > >> >> >> Why does db41-shlibs conflict with db4-shlibs? It wouldn't need a new >> name if it did. And if it replaces db4-shlibs, gift needs new >> dependencies. >> > > I thought this error was fixed for gift in cvs. (and indeed when I look > in 10.2/unstable it seems to be so). > > db41 and db4 are binary incompatible, the new name is necessary to avoid > people having to rebuild everything linked against libdb-4 (although I > made a mistake at first and committed it as db4 to the 10.2/unstable > tree, that is fixed now).
OK, so I had the problem because I did a "update-all", which tried to install db41 before updating gift. And the Conflicts was only with the bogus version of db4-shlibs? So it reduces to another one of those cases where the automatic update-all doesn't work. -- Martin ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
