At 23:56 Uhr +0900 04.11.2002, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Well, I think we should still stick to the new scheme. It will prevent far more problems than it will cause in my estimation, and working around a real compile bug (which still is possible!) is IMHO superior to having to work around the normal, correct, yet not desired behaviour caused by our old usage of CPPFLAGS etc.On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 01:11 PM, Ben Hines wrote:My apologies for posting this and promptly going to bed. Thanks Jean-Francois, Max and Ben for looking into it.Bingo. definitely a gcc bug, already filed:http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl and search for 7327.
It kind of leads to the question of what to do about fink's default CPPFLAGS again.
That is, I do think that right now, but the new stuff still needs more testing and possibly work before we can attempt any final decision.
Cheers,
Max
--
-----------------------------------------------
Max Horn
Software Developer
email: <mailto:max@;quendi.de>
phone: (+49) 6151-494890
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in
Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be
fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
