This sounds like a great idea.
-Ben
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 05:00 PM, Justin Hallett wrote:
so as a temp fix why don't we make use of GCC: 3.1 and if GCC: 3.1 then
CPPFLAGS = -I/sw/include instead of -isystem??
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyway, the workaround (disabling isystem) will quite likely be needed
for any C++ package. I am not saying i object to it.. isystem may
actually be preferable.. but currently it does seem to break more than
it helps.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in
Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be
fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in
Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be
fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
