At 17:12 Uhr -0500 29.01.2003, Alexander Hansen wrote:
A future issue for concern (after libpng vs. libpng3) is gtkhtml vs.
gtkhtml1.1 .  A lot of the users have GNOME, and gnome-core-shlibs
depends on gtkhtml, as does gnucash (the two examples I actually have
installed).  However, evolution-1.2 depends on gtkhtml1.1-shlibs .

This leads to a failed update-all because gtkhtml can't be removed in
favor of gtkhtml-shlibs.
Hu? both should coexist just fine, no?


However, force-installing gtkhtml1.1 for evolution (as I have done)
doesn't seem to cause any obvious runtime difficulties.
... but that is clearly not something we should want to suggest to a broad audience. It fixes the symptomes instead of curing the problem.


Max


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to