On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 17:46, Max Horn wrote: > At 17:12 Uhr -0500 29.01.2003, Alexander Hansen wrote: > >A future issue for concern (after libpng vs. libpng3) is gtkhtml vs. > >gtkhtml1.1 . A lot of the users have GNOME, and gnome-core-shlibs > >depends on gtkhtml, as does gnucash (the two examples I actually have > >installed). However, evolution-1.2 depends on gtkhtml1.1-shlibs . > > > >This leads to a failed update-all because gtkhtml can't be removed in > >favor of gtkhtml-shlibs. > > Hu? both should coexist just fine, no? > Sorry--caffeine in bloodstream failing. I meant gtkhtml can't be removed in favor of gtkhtml1.1
> >However, force-installing gtkhtml1.1 for evolution (as I have done) > >doesn't seem to cause any obvious runtime difficulties. > > ... but that is clearly not something we should want to suggest to a > broad audience. It fixes the symptomes instead of curing the problem. > And I haven't done so on -beginners or -users > > Max -- Alexander K. Hansen Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center Levitated Dipole Experiment 175 Albany Street, NW17-219 Cambridge, MA 02139-4213 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
