Ben:  Thanks for the update.  I'm somewhat at a loss of how to proceed
with a 4.3.0 package.  Since it contains thread support, it should replace
both xfree86-base and xfree86-base-threaded.  At the same time, I'd like
to merge the -base and -rootless variants.  So, the new package should
replace xfree86-base, -base-threaded, -rootless and -rootless-threaded.
Unfortunately, with all the intertwined dependencies I think this is
impossible.  So, I think we may have to resort to telling people to use
the dreaded "dpkg -r --force-depends" in order to make this transition.
Have you found a way around this with your experimental package?

-Jeff

 On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Benjamin Reed wrote:

> On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 06:46 PM, Torrey Lyons wrote:
>
> > The code freeze for XFree86 4.3.0 will be any day now. I believe the
> > Mac OS X/Darwin part of the code base is pretty much in final form.
> > Benjamin put together a package in fink unstable which builds
> > something very close to the top of the tree. I would encourage as many
> > people as possible to give it a try. The libraries and clients from
> > this version will be used for Apple's final release of X11 although
> > the X server will not be synced up until after 4.3.0 is out. Please
> > let me know promptly if you find any bugs.
> >
> > There has been only one bug fix since Benjamin's package was put
> > together: In 16-bit color pixmaps could sometimes appear shifted by 1
> > pixel from what was intended.
>
> Actually I updated it to a new snapshot as of this morning, so if you
> get it now, you get one that should include that fix (I watch the X
> commits list and saw the bugfixes).
>
> Jeffrey Whitaker is actually the maintainer of XFree86 in Fink, but I
> just wanted to reiterate that the packages in experimental are for the
> most part for my own edification, and because I was doing some testing
> for Torrey.
>
> Jeff, I don't know what your plans are for release, but if you want
> them, feel free to take over the packages in my exp tree.  I'm pretty
> certain they would need looking at, I didn't double-check that the
> shlibs stuff is right and that type of thing, so these aren't
> release-ready in the fink sense, although they're perfectly good for
> helping Torrey test.
>
> As of the last snapshots, things have worked pretty good as far as
> backwards-compatibility with software built against xfree86 4.2, but
> keep in mind that if you plan on testing this, and you build something
> against it, it won't work if you want to go back to 4.2.1.1 (including
> Apple's X11).  =)
>

-- 
Jeffrey S. Whitaker         Phone : (303)497-6313
NOAA/OAR/CDC  R/CDC1        FAX   : (303)497-6449
325 Broadway                Web   : http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/~jsw
Boulder, CO, USA 80305-3328 Office: Skaggs Research Cntr 1D-124


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to