On Monday, Mar 31, 2003, at 11:00 Australia/Sydney, Ben Hines wrote:
On Sunday, March 30, 2003, at 02:43 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
(Depends on whether it means that people don't have to pay the author a
licensing fee, or that distributors are prevented from collecting
licensing fees.)
Actually, I think that clearly means that they letting you distribute it without needing to licens it from them. 'licensing' implies a permission grant made by the author, not a distributor.
So I guess the license should either be "OSI-Approved", or "Restrictive/Distributable". Which one shall we use?
What's restrictive about it? I see nothing.
I tend towards 'Restrictive/Distributable' because nothing is mentioned specifically in the glut license about distributing binaries, its just a general statement or maybe I'm being to picky.
Matt
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
