-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 +-------------- Benjamin Reed [20030402 @ 14:45] -------------- | Karin Kosina wrote: | | >I still do not see how enabling prebinding can ever be bad. | | I don't see how it can be bad either, but I also don't see how it can be | *automated*. If you know how we can have the offsets be the same across | all fink installations, then go for it. But one of the goals of Fink is | for the resulting binaries to be the same across all installations, | regardless of where they're built.
This is impossible. Even if we found a way of initially having the same offsets, the system itself might change them later (when running update_prebinding). So if by "the same" you mean byte-wise-binary-diff-the-same, it's a no-no. Well, thanks a lot for your time, and good luck for the future! Cheers, =/~ K -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQE+i0fK7vvdOh/igesRAmTSAJ92A1DOA+QPHLDJPWPKxD9dGKirmACcDN1I JQifxH4/rCs22ofddXxTF2Q= =I2mc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
