-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160
jfm wrote:
Hi,No, that was a slip up by me. As you can tell that package was done quite swiftly and a bit hastily. I have a dual G5 I test this on and i wanted to see how much -fast can tune code as simple as the one in agrep. Thus I forgot to remove it from the patch again. However, as I have not received any complaints about the program not running they either all have G5 or it simply doe snot much on G4's
I see packages coming up in 10.3 that set the '-fast' flag _ eg, agrep, in the patch (after correcting 644 to 755 in the first install command and fixing the second...) My understanding is that some mechanism would then be needed in fink to automatically add the appropriate -mcpu and -mtune flags. Is this contemplated ? Or excluded on the principle that all debs must be identical ??
- -d -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
iD8DBQE/vP5PiW/Ta/pxHPQRA3F+AJ91oDs693ramRZY2vVUJ/X8rFUdSgCgzWMs BytovVa40y/ivxKY+omvGSM= =52gm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
