-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160
Max Horn wrote:
Because it is neither really testing nor is it alpha code. It is a development branch we does run reliably stable, it is just not meant for production because it usual has many experimental features of the OpenPGP standard. Thus it would be hard to support all those if it went into the stable branch too quickly.
Am Montag, 01.12.03 um 11:31 Uhr schrieb D. Höhn:
IMHO that name would easily lead to confusion. Why not "gnupg-alpha" or "gnupg-testing" etc.?-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160
Hello all
I know we have an excellent and working gnupg package. Yet, as I am a frequent user and thus sometimes test GPG or use experimental features i would like to include a package for the development tree (namels 1.3.4).
I have it installed and it works on my local box. Yes I cannot name this package gnupg-dev since that would violate policies.
is gnupgdev a suitable name? Thanks
thus my dilemma
- -d -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
iD8DBQE/y8BtPMoaMn4kKR4RAxB3AJ4iSSgf5DYcw9H+MetTrwhUChGJlwCfROgl xm2WyD2RXgOaOjL7FnYs4MY= =z3ap -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
