Am Montag, 01.12.03 um 23:27 Uhr schrieb Darian Lanx:
[...]
I still don't see a dilemma :-). For me the names "gnupg-testing" or "gnupg-unstable" still describe *exactly* what you say above in the Debian/Fink way of naming things.IMHO that name would easily lead to confusion. Why not "gnupg-alpha" or "gnupg-testing" etc.?Because it is neither really testing nor is it alpha code. It is a development branch we does run reliably stable, it is just not meant for production because it usual has many experimental features of the OpenPGP standard. Thus it would be hard to support all those if it went into the stable branch too quickly.
thus my dilemma
Max
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
